A ‘talking stick’, also known as a
‘speaker’s staff’, is an apparatus of aboriginal democracy used by many tribes,
especially those of indigenous peoples of the Northwest Coast of North America.
The stick is passed between a group of people, and whomever has the stick has
the power to talk. If this idea were incorporated into Tinder, the metaphorical
talking stick would be given to those who swipe right last in a pairing.
http://www.yourtango.com/2015251011/10-worst-tinder-dates-ever-witnessed-by-bartenders
As discussed in previous posts, to open a
message with a potential match, both parties must have swiped right. This means
that the first person to find out that you and your future S/O have matched is
the second swipe-er. This gives this person the power to send “The First
Message” or in Tinder terms: “The Cheesiest Pick-up Line Possible”.
Because of these specifications, the power
of the speaker’s staff goes to the second swipe-er and therefore has nothing to
do with cultural groups or demographics. This in itself facilitates
communication between diverse groups of people - or more specifically, has the
potential to facilitate communication between diverse groups of people,
depending on the diversity of your ‘swipe rights’. However, though the power of
the speaker’s staff goes to the second swipe-er, access to speech is spread out
evenly among users.
So, given that the power of the speaker’s
staff is given to the second swipe-er, that person also has the power to direct
the flow of conversation by creating their mood with their specific online
identity (Kuttainen, 2015), (McNeil, 2012).
For example, should you begin with “I’m an
apple farmer who missed out on farmer wants a wife”, the humour gives the first
swiper the ability to respond in kind, “You should’ve led with ‘you’re the
apple of my eye’”.
OR should you begin with “Hey, how are
you?”, the first swipe-er can only respond in kind “I’m fine, thanks.”
However! Unlike with other social media
mediums, it is IMPOSSIBLE to maintain a virtual persona that is unlike the IRL
persona you have, for one very simple reason.
The idea of the app is to ACTUALLY MEET IRL.
References:
Kuttainen, V. (2015) BA1002 Space:
Networks, Narratives, and the Making of Place. Week 3 page 3
McNeil, L. (2012) There is no I in Network:
Social Networking Sites and Posthuman Auto/Biography.
(Marking disclosure: FLOSS! I was trying to put my portfolio together when I realised that this week 6 post wasn't up but it's been sitting in my BA folder since then... so I didn't really know what to do...)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.